previously circulated with title "Bank Deposit Mix and Aggregate Implications for Financial Stability".
Large banks rely predominantly on liquid deposits despite their exposure to withdrawal risk. Using U.S. Call Report data, I document a pronounced size gradient in deposit composition and flow volatility: large banks allocate more than 80 percent of deposits to liquid instruments yet experience substantially lower and less volatile outflows than small banks. To quantify the aggregate implications of heterogeneous withdrawal risk, I develop a general equilibrium model in which banks optimally choose deposit mix and liquidity buffers under stochastic withdrawals. Withdrawal shocks trigger mid-period asset liquidation, linking funding structure to bank capital dynamics and equilibrium credit supply. Heterogeneity expands credit in normal times but amplifies downturns. Granting large banks more stable funding increases steady-state lending; equalizing withdrawal risk reduces aggregate loans by 1 percent and output by 0.7 percent. However, because large banks operate with thinner liquidity buffers, adverse shocks force costly balance sheet adjustment toward stable funding and liquid assets, raising funding costs and crowding out loans. Output contractions are 60 percent larger than in an economy with uniform withdrawal risk. A Basel III-style liquidity requirement halves capital losses during withdrawal shocks but reduces steady-state loans by 4 percent and output by 3 percent.